What Is a Good Method for Sharing Your Response in a Peer Review Answerscom
5 reasons why peer review matters
To mark Peer Review Calendar week, PhD pupil and member of the Vocalisation of Immature Science network, tells us why peer review matters #peerrevwk15
By Roganie Govender Posted on thirty September 2015
I recall the mix of emotions I felt on submitting my first manuscript to a peer reviewed periodical - some satisfaction and pride in getting to the point of submission, but mostly anxious and nervous about this procedure called peer review. I had heard from others that many manuscripts don't go past this stage, and that experts are ruthless in taking apart your work. But then a well published, highly respected expert and genuinely wonderful person reminded me – peer review is what the proper noun suggests: your peers in the field examining your work and raising questions near aspects of the work that may demand greater clarity. They may also offer an unbiased view, highlighting when sure claims cannot be drawn from your work, given the scope of the study design and methodology. I pondered this and came to the decision that peer review should then be a practiced thing. 'It will help me put my inquiry claims in context and improve my newspaper'.
Peer Review Week 2015
Peer Review Week will run from Monday 28th September to Friday second Oct, and will include a series of weblog posts and interviews, a social media campaign, webinars, and more. Follow Peer Review Week 2015 activities on twitter #PeerRevWk15
My newly framed interpretation of the peer review process meant I felt less nervous while I awaited a response from the journal. Information technology did not reduce the immediate disappointment and feelings of unworthiness I felt upon receiving a rejection! Fortunately, I was able to learn from the feel, motility on and keep to successfully publish. Since so I have performed a few peer reviews myself and I can run across the merits from both perspectives.
Earlier this year, I had the opportunity to attend a preparation afternoon – Peer review the nuts and bolts – hosted past Sense About Science equally part of their VoYS programme. It was a valuable opportunity to hear about peer review from editors and to discuss peer review with other early career researchers and PhD students. The insights I gained from this workshop got me thinking in one case again virtually why peer review matters. I have come to understand that peer review is near striving towards the TRUTH – the very quest of scientific enquiry! Hither are 5 reasons why I think peer review matters…
Time to reflect: The process provides a reviewer with the opportunity to reflect on someone else's work and to provide thoughtful comment using his/her ain noesis and expertise of the subject. Being asked to review a manuscript assumes that the reviewer has some expertise relevant to the content, and that this knowledge volition be helpful in evaluating the merits of a piece of work. Equally on receiving feedback from peer review, authors have time to reflect on how their enquiry is viewed by experts in the field. It is a time when improvements can be fabricated to a manuscript via constructive substitution between authors and peer reviewers/editors.
Research quality: I am a big fan of Which magazine– As a consumer I like knowing that products I buy take been reviewed and given quality ratings. On some level, I like to call back that peer review does the aforementioned for scientific publications. It provides some quality balls to consumers of research.
Understanding our ethical responsibility every bit researchers: We undertake and publish inquiry in the hope that our findings will contribute to the betterment of some phenomenon. In medical research this may impact people'south lives. The manner in which we comport research and the basis upon which we make claims should therefore be subject to scrutiny. Authors and reviewers share this upstanding responsibleness.
Training: As a PhD student, engaging in the procedure of peer review, either as a reviewer or every bit an author receiving feedback contributes greatly to my grooming and development as a researcher. I see it as an opportunity for bookish dialogue. Peer reviewing the work of others has helped me to think more critically almost my own work.
Helping each other: Peer review makes me feel function of the scientific community. There is some satisfaction in knowing that I tin can accept input into improving a piece of piece of work, and that others may exercise likewise for me. I would like to believe that reviewers share this sense of collegiality.
I do hope that I will remain true to my ideals as I develop as a researcher, but in case I should err – someone please remind me of this TRUTH!
Author Biography
Roganie Govender is a speech & language therapist at Academy Higher London Hospital. She is currently on a 3-year enquiry secondment undertaking a PhD focusing on improving the swallowing function in patients treated for head and neck cancer. Roganie won a National Institute of Wellness Research/ Health Pedagogy England Doctoral Fellowship which funds her work.
Source: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/reviewers-update/5-reasons-why-peer-review-matters
0 Response to "What Is a Good Method for Sharing Your Response in a Peer Review Answerscom"
Post a Comment